5 Best Beqom Competitors for HR and Comp Teams in 2025

If you are an existing Beqom user evaluating Beqom competitors and alternatives, you are at the right place. 

Beqom is a widely known solution for its compensation management, pay equity, and pay intelligence modules. It is a go-to solution for enterprise rewards teams, enabling the creation of salary ranges, visualizing performance data, and scaling compensation operations as a whole. 

However, all is not well with Beqom users. We reviewed popular review platforms, such as G2, Capterra, and SelectHub, to find users reporting challenges like Beqom’s high level of customization leading to complexity, a steep learning curve, and a long implementation time. Some users have also raised concerns about Beqom’s slow-response support team, 

“For integrations and changes in architecture that are not standard, support is sometimes difficult to get and takes long to implement. Sometimes such kind of requirements tend to get forgotten.” - Says a verified user on G2. 

If you have struggled with any one of the above challenges while using Beqom, let us help you. We are listing five of the best Beqom alternatives in this article to help you make an informed choice when looking for a Beqom competitor. 

Let’s get started. 

Why Should You Look for Beqom Competitors? 

The reasons for seeking a Beqom alternative can vary among different users. However, based on our research on platforms such as G2, Capterra, SelectHub, and Reddit, we identified several key issues related to Beqom that consistently arose. 

These are as follows: 

A user describes Beqom’s flexibility as a “double-edged sword” 

Beqom is a highly flexible comp management software with several customization options. However, this flexibility often makes it a complex tool that only a few users can understand and use. Users often tend to overcustomize the tool, which can lead to errors and system performance issues. 

This is also the reason why Beqom users complain about a steep learning curve. Users need a significant amount of time to get familiar with the tool, and comp teams generally don’t have that much ramp-up time, especially during peak seasons. 

“The flexibility of the beqom system can be a double-edged sword with higher complexity leading to higher risk of user errors or system performance issues.” - Varun S.

Source

Increased flexibility often leads to longer implementation 

Another challenge with Beqom’s highly flexible compensation software is a prolonged implementation phase. When you add a large number of customizations, it means more time is required to finalize your comp operations. For new users, this also means additional training, and as a result, the time to go-live extends. 

“The trade-off of increased flexibility means a longer implementation time and additional training for the system administrator.” - Justin, Compensation Director in US

Source

Limited true configurability despite flexibility promises

While Beqom markets itself as highly flexible, users often discover that achieving truly unique organizational requirements requires workarounds rather than native functionality. Instead of building integrated features, Beqom frequently provides external solutions like Excel macro files or basic attachments that aren't systematically integrated into the platform.

This approach creates maintenance challenges and doesn't provide the seamless, integrated experience that enterprise users expect from modern compensation platforms.

Recurring regressions and collapses frequently 

Beqom users frequently report system crashes and regressions that occur at the worst possible times - during active compensation cycles when reliability is most critical. These technical issues can derail entire comp processes, leaving teams scrambling to meet deadlines.

“Recurring regressions, unfortunately when we need the tool to be fully functional.” - A verified user on G2

Source

The unpredictability of these system failures creates additional stress for comp teams who are already working under tight timelines. When your compensation platform crashes mid-cycle, it's not just an inconvenience - it can impact your entire organization's pay decisions and employee satisfaction.

“a bit difficult to have an overview if the process crashes somewhere” - Catherine, Business Analyst in Belgium

Source

Why do these features actually matter for HR and comp teams?

These are serious operational challenges that can significantly impact your compensation team's effectiveness and your organization's talent strategy:

• Workaround solutions instead of native features: When platforms rely on external files and macros rather than built-in functionality, it creates ongoing maintenance burdens and system fragmentation that IT and HR teams must manage
• Delayed compensation cycles: Long implementation cycle and system instability can push back critical pay decisions, affecting employee retention and satisfaction during peak hiring seasons
• Resource drain on comp teams: When your platform requires extensive customization and training, your team spends more time managing the tool than focusing on strategic compensation decisions
• Increased operational risk: System crashes during active cycles can jeopardize entire compensation processes, potentially leading to pay inequities or compliance issues
• Higher total cost of ownership: Extended implementations, additional training requirements, and ongoing system maintenance can significantly exceed your initial platform investment
• Reduced stakeholder confidence: When managers and executives experience frequent system issues or overly complex interfaces, they lose trust in the compensation process and data accuracy

The bottom line? Your compensation platform should enhance your team's strategic capabilities, not create additional operational burdens. 

If you're spending more time troubleshooting your comp tool than optimizing your pay strategies, it's time to explore alternatives.

5 Best Beqom Competitors and Alternatives in 2025

Let us now explore the Beqom competitors one by one. But before that, here is a quick comparison of all Beqom alternatives: 

‍Note: The sources of all pros and cons are G2 and Capterra.

Compport 

Compport is a comprehensive compensation management platform that consolidates merit cycles, bonus planning, pay equity management, long-term incentives, and sales incentives into a single system. Compport serves over 300 companies across 37+ countries and manages compensation for more than 1 million employees globally.

Unlike Beqom's complex approach, which often leads to lengthy implementations, Compport emphasizes simplicity and speed without sacrificing functionality. The platform addresses the key pain points that Beqom users face: overcomplexity, extended implementation times, and system instability issues.

In fact, Compport helped Excelerate Energy go live within just two months. Read the full case study here. 

The major comp modules include:

• Compensation Planning - On-cycle or ad-hoc salary reviews with robust analytics
• Bonus Planning - Variable pay and incentive program design with real-time simulations
• Long Term Incentives - Comprehensive LTI plan management with automated vesting tracking
• Sales Incentives Planning - Commission and sales comp automation with flexible rule engines
• Pay Equity Management - Continuous pay equity monitoring with ML-powered gap analysis
• Total Rewards Statements & Letters - Employee compensation transparency with interactive/ dynamic dashboards and letters
• HR Analytics - Multi-dimensional analytics from turnover, productivity, diversity, pay-performance link, market parity, historic and futuristic trend analysis, to pay equity analytics. 

Top features 

• Modern, survey-like UI that requires minimal training, contrasting with Beqom's steep learning curve and complex navigation
• All functionality is built directly into the platform rather than relying on external macro files or workarounds, ensuring seamless integration and easier maintenance
• Powerful rule engines that avoid the "double-edged sword" complexity that Beqom users report, allowing sophisticated logic without overwhelming administrators
• Unlike Beqom's extended implementation cycles, Compport's enables go-live in 2-8 weeks with dedicated implementation support
• Proactive pay equity management embedded in daily compensation decisions, not just annual compliance checks
• All compensation processes, like Merit cycles, bonus planning, pay equity, long-term incentives, short-term incentives, total rewards statements, and analytics, are unified in a single platform; hence, no module complexity 

Pros of Compport

• Highly responsive 24/7 support with fast turnaround times (as low as 4 hours)
• Custom requirements are built as native platform features, not external files or macro solutions
• 200+ built-in reports answer stakeholder questions proactively
• Modern and intuitive UI/ UX
• Easy integration with any HRMS, including SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, ADP, and Oracle
• AI-powered salary increment optimization and bias detection are built into core workflows

Cons of Compport

• Newer player in the US and EU markets compared to some legacy vendors

Salary.com

Salary.com is a compensation data provider that focuses on market benchmarking and salary analysis. The platform serves as a comprehensive resource for organizations seeking compensation data and analytics to support pay decisions across various industries.

Top features 

• Access to multiple salary surveys and comprehensive benchmarking databases with monthly data refreshes
• A job leveling system that clearly distinguishes junior, senior, manager, and director levels
• Integration capabilities with ADP, UKG, Workday, and other major HRIS systems
• Built-in analytical tools for compa-ratios and salary projections

Pros of Salary.com

• Excel-native logic provides familiarity while adding governance and compliance
• Strong audit trails and proration flexibility are useful in regulated industries
• Offline Excel exports support distributed teams without losing control

Cons of Salary.com

• UI feels dated and requires deep Excel expertise for advanced configurations
• Limited real-time analytics; much analysis still depends on external spreadsheets
• Some self-service functions still rely on Salary.com’s services team

Payscale

Payscale offers compensation management software that combines market data with planning tools. The platform provides both data analytics capabilities and workflow management for compensation processes, serving companies of various sizes across different industries.

Top features 

• Blend multiple data sources, including industry surveys, company data, and crowdsourced data, in a visually friendly interface
• Ad hoc pricing capabilities for pulling data on new roles
• Total compensation communication tools to help employees understand pay components

Pros of Payscale 

• Extremely granular configurability through a visual rule builder
• Deep auditability and compliance strength suited for regulated industries
• Strong governance and policy enforcement mechanisms

Cons of Payscale 

• Complex to administer; often requires heavy training or vendor support
• The planner interface is rigid and less user-friendly compared to modern platforms
• Limited integration with Payscale’s own market data tools

💡Not happy with Payscale? Here are all the Payscale Competitors you should know about!

Pave

Pave is a modern compensation platform that emphasizes real-time market data for companies. The platform focuses on providing comprehensive compensation management, featuring strong data visualization and employee communication tools, which are particularly popular among tech companies and startups.

Top features 

• Real-time market data integration with HRIS and cap table for accurate, never-stale data
• Data consolidation to a standard leveling framework with benchmarking 
• Merit cycle workflows with customizable recommendations and approval processes
• Free benchmarking tool for real-time market data in hiring decisions

Pros of Pave 

• Clean, simple UI with easy company comparison capabilities
• Strong collaboration features like commenting and approval workflows
• Flexible admin tools with a balance of self-service and vendor support

Cons of Pave 

• Budgeting tools are not as advanced as enterprise-grade platforms
• Analytics are solid but lack deep customization options
• Multi-geo or complex setups may require vendor involvement

HRSoft

HRSoft provides a comprehensive compensation software designed to meet global compensation requirements. The platform emphasizes flexibility and configurability to accommodate unique organizational needs while maintaining strong integration capabilities with existing HR systems.

Top features

• Global capabilities supporting multi-country compensation needs with currency handling
• Strong configurability for complex compensation plans while maintaining accuracy and compliance
• Total Rewards Communication feature for improving employee engagement and benefits understanding

Pros of HRSoft 

• Proven strength in financial services and healthcare, handling niche scenarios
• User-friendly interface and easy navigation for end users
• Flexible system that accommodates unique and complex compensation needs
• Seamless HRIS integration and automation of long-term incentives, simplifying complex processes

Cons of HRSoft  

• Planner and admin UI feel dated, with a steeper learning curve
• There is a limited focus on advanced analytics and AI-driven insights
• Employee-facing communication tools could be more engaging

What’s Next? 

Beqom remains a powerful compensation platform with comprehensive capabilities and strong global reach. However, exploring Beqom alternatives makes sense if you're experiencing challenges with system complexity, implementation timelines, technical stability, or responsiveness to support. 

The five competitors we reviewed each bring different strengths:

• Compport: Modern, reliable platform with rapid deployment and intuitive design
• Salary.com: Strong market data focus with extensive benchmarking capabilities
• Payscale: Established data provider with workflow management tools
• Pave: Clean UI with real-time data for tech-focused organizations
• HRSoft: Flexible enterprise solution with strong global capabilities

Consider your specific priorities - whether that's implementation speed, system reliability, or specialized features. 

Security Bank Corporation exemplifies successful transformation: this Philippine-based financial institution unified previously separate compensation processes into a single two-week window using Compport, achieving 90% user satisfaction while significantly reducing the administrative burden on its Total Rewards team.

Hear it from them 👇

‍

🔖 Read how Compport helped Security Bank transform their compensation management process

Here’s a quick comparison between Compport and Beqom: 

Compport vs. Beqom 

‍

CTA: Schedule a demo! 

FAQs 

What is the alternative to Beqom? 

The top Beqom alternatives include Compport, Salary.com, Payscale, Pave, and HRSoft. Each offers different strengths in compensation management, from modern interfaces to comprehensive market data and global scalability.

Is it worth switching from Beqom to a competitor? 

It depends on your specific pain points. If you're struggling with system complexity, implementation delays, or stability issues, exploring alternatives could be beneficial. Evaluate switching costs against potential productivity gains.

Can these platforms handle our existing compensation data when switching? 

Most modern compensation platforms offer data migration support; however, the complexity varies by vendor. Some provide white-glove migration services while others require manual effort. Always verify migration capabilities upfront.

‍